search

David Poljak vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljak vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

David Poljak vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Poljak 2 - 0 Zima

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 49.74% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 41.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 50.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 44.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.94% and 27.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 39.02% of matches played (W/L 16/ 25), with Zima winning 51.92% (W/L 27/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 108). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 62/ 60).
  • Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Poljak winning 2 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Poljak winning 4 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Poljak and Zima was at the M25 Prague, 06-10-2021, First, I.hard with David Poljak getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:20.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Poljak and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Poljak winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poljak winning 0, and Zima 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.73 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 127.65.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 34.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 41.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
David Poljak

6

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

6

Minor

897

Rank

370

High

28

Age

R

Plays

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

2

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

895

Rank

774

High

24

Age

R

Plays

Leopold Zima

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

2

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L L L W L W W L L

Form

L L W W W L L L W L

54% (306-258)

Career Total W/L

55% (159-128)

42% (8-11)

YTD W/L

59% (19-13)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For David Poljak vs Leopold Zima For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Poljak VS Zima

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Poljak VS Zima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats David Poljak Leopold Zima
All H2H Matches 2 0
Sets Won 4 0
Games Won 24 13
Aces (Total) 10 9
DFs Total 6 4
Avg Match Time 1:11:20 1:11:20
1st Serve % 55% (69/126) 59% (70/118)
1st Serve Win% 74% (51/69) 67% (47/70)
2nd Serve Win% 60% (34/57) 40% (19/48)
BPs Won% (Total) 44% (7/16) 25% (2/8)
Return Points W% 44% (52/118) 33% (41/126)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (2/0)

Poljak VS Zima H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-1
cross
David Poljak
Player
Leopold Zima
47% ( 22 of 47)
1st Serve %
61% ( 31 of 51)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64% ( 14 of 22)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
84% ( 21 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
26% ( 12 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 25 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
38
6-4 6-4
cross
David Poljak
Player
Leopold Zima
59% ( 47 of 79)
1st Serve %
58% ( 39 of 67)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
79% ( 37 of 47)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 30 of 39)
41% ( 13 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 10 of 28)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
37% ( 29 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 67)
77
Total Points Won
69

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats David Poljak Leopold Zima
YTD W/L 42% (8/11) 59% (19/13)
Sets Win/Loss 43% (19/25) 55% (40/33)
Games Win/Loss 50% (228/225) 51% (358/344)
Hard Win/Loss 60% (3/2) 71% (5/2)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/1) 47% (7/8)
Indoor Hard W/L 38% (5/8) 70% (7/3)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.57 0.2
Aces Total 125 70
DFs per game 0.18 0.12
DFs Total 40 40
Avg Match Time 1:47:56 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 159.53 109.09
1st Serve % 61% (907/1482) 68% (717/1057)
1st Serve W% 72% (655/907) 68% (490/717)
2nd Serve W% 50% (286/575) 41% (141/340)
BPs Won% Total 34% (45/132) 41% (31/75)
Return Pts W% 37% (536/1451) 34% (335/984)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 25% (1/3) 0% (0/1)
Futures W/L 47% (7/8) 61% (19/12)
Best of 3 Sets W% 42% (8/19) 59% (19/32)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 33% (3/9) 44% (4/9)
Deciding Set W% 50% (3/6) 78% (7/9)
1st set W, W 71% (7/5) 94% (17/16)
1st set W, L 29% (7/2) 6% (17/1)
1st set L, W 25% (12/3) 20% (15/3)

David Poljak Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Robert Strombachs
Player
David Poljak
64% ( 75 of 118)
1st Serve %
67% ( 72 of 107)
2
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
65% ( 49 of 75)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 40 of 72)
35% ( 15 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
46% ( 54 of 118)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 48 of 107)
112
Total Points Won
113
L
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66% ( 69 of 105)
1st Serve %
58% ( 51 of 88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71% ( 49 of 69)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 36 of 51)
42% ( 15 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 18 of 37)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
39% ( 41 of 105)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 34 of 88)
98
Total Points Won
95
L
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58% ( 49 of 84)
1st Serve %
81% ( 55 of 68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 38 of 55)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 30 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 24 of 68)
78
Total Points Won
74
W
7-5 7-5 H2H
Q2
cross
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68% ( 43 of 63)
1st Serve %
64% ( 46 of 72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84% ( 36 of 43)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 30 of 46)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
24% ( 15 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 28 of 72)
76
Total Points Won
59
W
7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66% ( 55 of 83)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73% ( 40 of 55)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 25 of 33)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 10 of 19)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 10)
35% ( 29 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 17 of 52)
71
Total Points Won
64
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q2
cross
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58% ( 40 of 69)
1st Serve %
67% ( 33 of 49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
45% ( 13 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 9 of 16)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
38% ( 26 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 24 of 49)
67
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60% ( 31 of 52)
1st Serve %
59% ( 36 of 61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
67
Total Points Won
46
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53% ( 36 of 68)
1st Serve %
66% ( 54 of 82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69% ( 25 of 36)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
59% ( 19 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 24 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 37 of 82)
81
Total Points Won
69
L
6-4 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72% ( 55 of 76)
1st Serve %
53% ( 55 of 104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65% ( 36 of 55)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 36 of 55)
48% ( 10 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 21 of 49)
25% ( 4 of 16)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
39% ( 30 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 47 of 104)
93
Total Points Won
87
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60% ( 48 of 80)
1st Serve %
58% ( 50 of 86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73% ( 35 of 48)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
53% ( 17 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
35% ( 28 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 86)
89
Total Points Won
77
W
4-6 6-1 6-4 H2H

Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
L
7-5 4-0 ret. H2H
Q1
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75% ( 45 of 60)
1st Serve %
76% ( 54 of 71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64% ( 29 of 45)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 30 of 54)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
37% ( 22 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 71)
74
Total Points Won
57
L
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
R1
cross
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59% ( 16 of 27)
1st Serve %
72% ( 23 of 32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75% ( 12 of 16)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
26% ( 7 of 27)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
40
Total Points Won
19
L
6-0 2-0 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69% ( 37 of 54)
1st Serve %
68% ( 46 of 68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 28 of 46)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 19 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 31 of 68)
66
Total Points Won
56
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63% ( 47 of 75)
1st Serve %
61% ( 48 of 79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70% ( 33 of 47)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 34 of 48)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 28 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 27 of 79)
74
Total Points Won
80
W
1-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
W
3-6 6-3 10-8 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve %
46% ( 19 of 41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 11 of 19)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 9 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 23 of 41)
51
Total Points Won
27
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
QF
L
6-3 1-6 10-5 H2H

Poljak Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Poljak are available here and Zima photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions